SoundBite Home RSS 2.0 Feed

“Open Mouth, Insert Fine” or “Real Estate Roulette”

roulette.jpgWith the advent of the Internet, information has become accessible at blinding speed. Want to know the migrating habits of the South African Gnu? What is the proper way to eat sushi? Or what was the original color of coca-cola? Powerful search engines enable us to locate virtually anything we want at the touch of a few keys. Websites, forums, and networks abound where we can obtain answers for every conceivable question. Information equips and empowers. It serves to form our opinions and guides our decisions.

This rapid accessibility and transfer of information is changing the way we conduct business as well. Companies and business professionals are moving away from one-sided, static websites to dynamic, interactive platforms, such as blogging, that allow consumers the ability to directly engage in virtual conversations.

Open and transparent dialog is a welcomed development in the real estate industry. The shrouds of mystery surrounding our profession have been quickly dissipating, offering consumers a well-deserved look into the inner-workings of the real estate world.

But there are inherent dangers to this new-found ‘free-for-all’ of information. And the potentially damaging ramifications exist for either side of the discussion.gagged.jpg

Here’s an example of an actual ‘real’ question that was recently posed by a consumer on a popular real estate site:

“We just recently put our home on the market and we’re wondering, what is the selling market like now? What is the average time to sell a home in the $800K range?”

I’m not going to publish the various ‘responses’ to this inquiry (there were 5 answers at last look), but suffice it to say that all of the respondents chimed in with very detailed local markets statistics, jockeying and positioning themselves as the undisputed resident authorities. Almost all of them offered some measure of advice or counsel, and added the ‘perfunctory’ “for more information, my website/email is blah, blah, blah“….

What I found curiously missing was the question that should always be asked right out of the gate:

“Are you currently working with a licensed real estate professional?”

I’m thinking to myself, does this person have their home listed through a licensed agent, or are they attempting to market it on their own?

As real estate professionals, it’s ingrained into us from almost day one (Realtor Code of Ethics, Article 16) NOT to engage, counsel, or solicit someone who is, by contract, under representation by another agent. When in doubt, ASK!

And, as a consumer who is asking the question, how do you know if the individuals responding to your questions are actually ‘qualified’ to answer accurately? Are they licensed in the State where your home is located? Do they know and understand the unique nuances of your particular area? Who holds them accountable if they provide you with misleading or false information? How do you know for sure if they’re even a ‘real’ real estate professional?

Now don’t get me wrong. I am thrilled about all the advancements in Internet technology and their impact on the real estate industry. Many of the applications are having a very positive effect, both for us professionals, and for consumers.

But as real estate professionals, in our drive and desire to be helpful, we need to be ethically prudent, and exercise caution on what we say, and to whom we respond.

And, as consumers, though the Internet opens up a unlimited wealth of resources, remember that ultimately, real estate is local. The best way to obtain a qualified response?

Ask a local expert.

, ,

Convert to PDF

5 Comments »

  debbie wrote @ May 4th, 2008 at 9:22 am

The Kitsap Sun from Washington. “In yet another indication Kitsap County is not immune from the current housing crisis, the number of properties that were scheduled for foreclosure auction during the first two months of this year is 140 percent higher over the same period last year.”

“About 110 properties were scheduled for auction in January and February combined, compared with 46 in 2007, according to the Bellevue-based ForeclosurePoint.com. Most were single-family homes.”

“Numbers from Kitsap County Assessor Jim Avery told the same tale. ‘Forced sales’ recorded by his office more than tripled between January and February 2007 and the first two months of 2008, from 33 to 101.”

  debbie wrote @ May 4th, 2008 at 9:23 am

The Kitsap Sun from Washington. “Houses are still moving in Kitsap County, albeit not at the past rapid pace. At ‘The 400′ in Bremerton, …the price on some new condominiums has been slashed by 58 percent, from $259,000 to $109,000.”

“Perhaps at the height of the housing market this 577-square-foot, one-bedroom, one-bath condo was worth $259,000 — but no more.”

“Welcome to another slumping housing market. I’m sure the current slowdown has surprised those who think most investments, including houses, only move upward in value. Sorry, that’s never been the case.”

  Rich Jacobson wrote @ May 5th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

Debbie - Just a couple things….first, we welcome intelligent and civil debate/discussion here on SoundBiteBlog. Secondly, we ask that your comments be relevant to the nature of the specific post to which you are commenting. And lastly, please refrain from using any slanderous or derogatory labels or language. Calling me a ‘moron’ doesn’t add much credibility to your comments. Thank you.

  Rebecca Levinson wrote @ May 7th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Hi Rich,

On the popular real estate forums, Q&A’s of Trulia and Zillow discussions, Linked In Discussions, etc. under the Code of Ethics, would a real estate professional be required to ask the consumer posing the question if they are currently working with an agent. And then, if another consumer chimes into the conversation, does the real estate agent then need to ask that consumer if they are working with a real estate agent before they answer them.

Please note, I ask this question in all sincerity. Thank you in advance for your response.

  Sparky wrote @ May 7th, 2008 at 3:26 pm

Rebecca - Thanks for stoppin by! The ‘red-flag’ phrase used here was “we just put our house on the market.” Before jumping into the fray, a discerning agent would naturally qualify any further discussion by clarifying what exactly does that mean? Are you working with another agent? Or are you marketing the home by yourself? Each response takes you in totally different directions. Unfortunately, in many of these ‘Q&A’ feature platforms, agents seem more concerned about promoting their contact information than they are providing solid, ethical responses. In my opinion, we undermine the value of agency relationship when we rush in too quickly to answer.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Your comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

“Open Mouth, Insert Fine” or “Real Estate Roulette”

roulette.jpgWith the advent of the Internet, information has become accessible at blinding speed. Want to know the migrating habits of the South African Gnu? What is the proper way to eat sushi? Or what was the original color of coca-cola? Powerful search engines enable us to locate virtually anything we want at the touch of a few keys. Websites, forums, and networks abound where we can obtain answers for every conceivable question. Information equips and empowers. It serves to form our opinions and guides our decisions.

This rapid accessibility and transfer of information is changing the way we conduct business as well. Companies and business professionals are moving away from one-sided, static websites to dynamic, interactive platforms, such as blogging, that allow consumers the ability to directly engage in virtual conversations.

Open and transparent dialog is a welcomed development in the real estate industry. The shrouds of mystery surrounding our profession have been quickly dissipating, offering consumers a well-deserved look into the inner-workings of the real estate world.

But there are inherent dangers to this new-found ‘free-for-all’ of information. And the potentially damaging ramifications exist for either side of the discussion.gagged.jpg

Here’s an example of an actual ‘real’ question that was recently posed by a consumer on a popular real estate site:

“We just recently put our home on the market and we’re wondering, what is the selling market like now? What is the average time to sell a home in the $800K range?”

I’m not going to publish the various ‘responses’ to this inquiry (there were 5 answers at last look), but suffice it to say that all of the respondents chimed in with very detailed local markets statistics, jockeying and positioning themselves as the undisputed resident authorities. Almost all of them offered some measure of advice or counsel, and added the ‘perfunctory’ “for more information, my website/email is blah, blah, blah“….

What I found curiously missing was the question that should always be asked right out of the gate:

“Are you currently working with a licensed real estate professional?”

I’m thinking to myself, does this person have their home listed through a licensed agent, or are they attempting to market it on their own?

As real estate professionals, it’s ingrained into us from almost day one (Realtor Code of Ethics, Article 16) NOT to engage, counsel, or solicit someone who is, by contract, under representation by another agent. When in doubt, ASK!

And, as a consumer who is asking the question, how do you know if the individuals responding to your questions are actually ‘qualified’ to answer accurately? Are they licensed in the State where your home is located? Do they know and understand the unique nuances of your particular area? Who holds them accountable if they provide you with misleading or false information? How do you know for sure if they’re even a ‘real’ real estate professional?

Now don’t get me wrong. I am thrilled about all the advancements in Internet technology and their impact on the real estate industry. Many of the applications are having a very positive effect, both for us professionals, and for consumers.

But as real estate professionals, in our drive and desire to be helpful, we need to be ethically prudent, and exercise caution on what we say, and to whom we respond.

And, as consumers, though the Internet opens up a unlimited wealth of resources, remember that ultimately, real estate is local. The best way to obtain a qualified response?

Ask a local expert.

, ,

Convert to PDF

5 Comments »

  debbie wrote @ May 4th, 2008 at 9:22 am

The Kitsap Sun from Washington. “In yet another indication Kitsap County is not immune from the current housing crisis, the number of properties that were scheduled for foreclosure auction during the first two months of this year is 140 percent higher over the same period last year.”

“About 110 properties were scheduled for auction in January and February combined, compared with 46 in 2007, according to the Bellevue-based ForeclosurePoint.com. Most were single-family homes.”

“Numbers from Kitsap County Assessor Jim Avery told the same tale. ‘Forced sales’ recorded by his office more than tripled between January and February 2007 and the first two months of 2008, from 33 to 101.”

  debbie wrote @ May 4th, 2008 at 9:23 am

The Kitsap Sun from Washington. “Houses are still moving in Kitsap County, albeit not at the past rapid pace. At ‘The 400′ in Bremerton, …the price on some new condominiums has been slashed by 58 percent, from $259,000 to $109,000.”

“Perhaps at the height of the housing market this 577-square-foot, one-bedroom, one-bath condo was worth $259,000 — but no more.”

“Welcome to another slumping housing market. I’m sure the current slowdown has surprised those who think most investments, including houses, only move upward in value. Sorry, that’s never been the case.”

  Rich Jacobson wrote @ May 5th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

Debbie - Just a couple things….first, we welcome intelligent and civil debate/discussion here on SoundBiteBlog. Secondly, we ask that your comments be relevant to the nature of the specific post to which you are commenting. And lastly, please refrain from using any slanderous or derogatory labels or language. Calling me a ‘moron’ doesn’t add much credibility to your comments. Thank you.

  Rebecca Levinson wrote @ May 7th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Hi Rich,

On the popular real estate forums, Q&A’s of Trulia and Zillow discussions, Linked In Discussions, etc. under the Code of Ethics, would a real estate professional be required to ask the consumer posing the question if they are currently working with an agent. And then, if another consumer chimes into the conversation, does the real estate agent then need to ask that consumer if they are working with a real estate agent before they answer them.

Please note, I ask this question in all sincerity. Thank you in advance for your response.

  Sparky wrote @ May 7th, 2008 at 3:26 pm

Rebecca - Thanks for stoppin by! The ‘red-flag’ phrase used here was “we just put our house on the market.” Before jumping into the fray, a discerning agent would naturally qualify any further discussion by clarifying what exactly does that mean? Are you working with another agent? Or are you marketing the home by yourself? Each response takes you in totally different directions. Unfortunately, in many of these ‘Q&A’ feature platforms, agents seem more concerned about promoting their contact information than they are providing solid, ethical responses. In my opinion, we undermine the value of agency relationship when we rush in too quickly to answer.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Your comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>